DVB-S or DVB-S2 version of HDHomeRun

solomalee · Joined: 19 May 2008 Posts: 7

Hi,

First, apologies for the cross post if that is frowned upon, but I thought this was actually better placed in the Development Forum.

I'd like to add my voice (there must be many others) to those that would love to see a DVB-S or DVB-S2 version of an HDHomeRun.

I am currently using Windows Vista Media Centre, but, I am increasingly underwhelmed by Microsoft and their third party developer's (D-Link, Netgear) support for extenders. A DVB-S(2) HDHomeRun would open the door I believe for a really slick MAC based solution using MAC Minis as Extenders (clients) to the HomeRun.

The home run seems to be unique in that I could position several in my loft and then not have to worry any more about how to get antenna cables to where I need TV services.

Please please please, bring on the DVB versions of the HDHomeRun!

As the previous poster mentioned, with the Go_Live of Freesat in the UK on 9th May 2008, there is a new market opening up for such a device.

Thanks in advance, waiting patiently!

solomalee · Joined: 19 May 2008 Posts: 7

I read that Microsoft will soon support DVB-S & S2 cards in Vista Media Centre (Already working in as part of the Vista MC Beta update that is due soon), this makes an even more compelling case for a Satellite version of this fabulously convenient looking device.

I can tell you now. When there is finally a DVB-S2 version of HDHR I'll be buying 3 of them.

Please please please, tell me you're working on it!

hkazemi · Joined: 21 Feb 2008 Posts: 2

A DVB-S2 version (that includes DVB-S compatibility) would be a welcome addition, particularly by the FTA (free-to-air) satellite community. SchedulesDirect might even be able to carry channel listings for FTA ... some discussion has started:
http://forums.schedulesdirect.org/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=537

LongView · Joined: 23 May 2009 Posts: 6

Just wanted to add a "me too" to this old thread. If you made a DVB-S/S2 version then I'd purchase one for sure. If this isn't technically possible then would be good to know so we can stop asking. Very Happy

jphastings · Joined: 16 Jul 2009 Posts: 3

This would be incredibly useful! DVB-T here in Britain can get very boring at times, so the ability to have a DVB-T HomeRunHD and a DVB-S2 to pick up FreeSat or Sky (please include a CI!) would make tv what it should be!

LongView · Joined: 23 May 2009 Posts: 6

Nice to see the dust being blown off this old thread. Shame there isn't a response which would seriously make me think twice before purchasing. I use Hauppauge tuners currently & their forum support is first rate & posts always receive a reply even if it's just to say they can't comment.

nickk · Silicondust Joined: 13 Jan 2004 Posts: 7979

Hi,

We understand that there is interest in the product and it is being discussed internally.

Nick

LongView · Joined: 23 May 2009 Posts: 6

Thanks for the response, that is excellent news. With Freesat already carrying HD services I'm sure you'd have customers...

ddunipace · Joined: 29 Jun 2009 Posts: 2

It is great to hear that SiliconDust are considering an option for DVB-S(2). I know I would be towards the front of the queue to buy 1 or maybe even 2. I am really enjoying using my HDHomeRun and has been a great replacement for my internal tuners.

One more thing I think that should also be considered (if it is not already being discussed) is DVB-T2 (Freeview HD in the UK) as this will probably give a greater access to HD content when it is launched later this year / early next year depending where you are in the UK.

adrianage · Joined: 13 Aug 2009 Posts: 1

Like LongView, I would also like to add a massive Me Too to this. I don't have the current model, because Freeview reception in my house is rubbish due to a badly positioned ariel. Rather than get Mr Ladders round to reposition it, I want to move to Freesat with the potential for FTA HD transmissions. But then, I'd love to - just as solomalee described - put a few in my loft for the three media PCs I have on my home network. That would be excellent! My brother wants to do the same. So that's an order of six already. That's got to cover the R&D cost already! Laughing

Seriously, I think that already, this product will change the way many people structure future home entertainment networks. Had I known about it before I bought my DVB-T Hauppauge cards, it would have been a no-brainer. Fully ready to correct that 'mistake' with DVB-S versions of the Homerun.....

LongView · Joined: 23 May 2009 Posts: 6

Nice to see more and more people adding their support to this thread. Very Happy

wharrad · Joined: 20 Aug 2009 Posts: 1

Hi!

Signed up just for this thread... I can't really add anything to what the others have said, but I'd love to let you guys know if you get a Freesat model - well, another couple of orders are safe!

jphastings · Joined: 16 Jul 2009 Posts: 3

Here here - S2 please! high definition FTA channels (esp. with Freesat gaining some momentum) would be exceptionally useful.

Of course the ability to put a CAM and cards in there too would be very useful. It'll always be a hack but Sky - using a legitimate card - would be great on my computer as I have a 24" iMac and an ancient 15" 4:3 TV...

[edit] Ha! I've posted here already, and there was me thinking "These guys have got the right idea!" oh well, I guess it shows how much I'm waiting for this!

solomalee · Joined: 19 May 2008 Posts: 7

Hi all,

Nice to see a few more people interested in the Idea

ideaware... but 17 months on...still waiting for the HDHR DVB-S2...

Surely now with Windows 7's built in support for Satellite TV services this product has to be close...please!

I just bought two Elgato EyeTV SAT USB boxes, but sadly, no Win 7 drivers yet...as soon as I have those drivers those puppies will be on a long USB in my attic...or will we see a HDHR with Satellite first?

Solo

WattoDaToydarian · Joined: 06 Jun 2007 Posts: 21

I may choose to get a dish someday and if I do the hdhomerun-S2 would be the best option by far. However I am concerned about the bit-rate used. I understand that the more channels per transport the less bandwidth per channel. Does anyone know how good it is?

Just my three cents...